- A controversial topic
- Might feel like a lecture (important issues, bio-pics)
- Hero has an unexciting profession (professor, mathematician, city planner, etc.)
- Hero’s an old person or a kid (too few bankable stars)
- Hero’s a person of color (alas, very few bankable stars right now)
- An out-of-favor genre
- A bleak ending
- Ensemble piece (no star roles)
- Super-expensive (a period piece, takes place at sea, etc.)
- Feel-good tone
- High-concept plot
- A hot genre
- Stand-up-and-cheer ending
- Funny and/or irreverent
- Suspenseful and/or action-packed
- A great love story
- A mind-blowing twist
- A lovable hero
- A less-than-lovable hero, but it’s a part any big-name actor would kill to play
- Fantastical element that disguises liabilities
- Low budget in a fun way (contained thriller, found footage, etc.)
This can work well with movies that are either too little or too big: On the one hand, Project X was a run-of-the-mill end-of-high-school blow-out party movie, but they marketed it around the found-footage element that made it seem fresh. On the other hand, Beasts of the Southern Wild overcame dozens of marketing liabilities to become an unexpected art-house hit by adding quirky fantasy elements that made it clear that it wouldn’t be a heavy-handed slog.
Rod Serling famously created “The Twilight Zone” because he had written a controversial TV movie about the US Senate only to watch the network cut the script to ribbons. Suddenly, he had a revelation:
- “In retrospect, I probably would have had a much more adult play had I made it science fiction, put it in the year 2057, and peopled the Senate with robots. This would probably have been more reasonable and no less dramatically incisive.”
3 comments:
Yup. I have come to terms with the fact that my story (not even a screenplay), is a hard sell. Assets and liabilities is a good way to put it. These lists are really useful in learning to define what is what.
I can dig this post, with the added caveat that at least from the point of view of certain powerful creatives (actors, directors and even some producers) many of the liabilities on your list are actually assets. Your script doesn't have to be for everybody if it's perfect for Brad Pitt or George Clooney or Jodie Foster to star in, produce and/or direct.
ARGO is a good example of a script with a number of liabilities from a big studio's POV but that got made because a star/director of Ben Affleck's stature chose it for precisely the reasons that the studio would otherwise be wary.
True. I once head some good advice: if there's only one star who would want to make your kind of movie, then the worst thing you can do is get it to his/her agent, who wants the star to stop making that kind of picture-- instead, you want to get it to the old friend who now runs the star's production company, which is where the star develops quirkier material, (to the eternal consternation of his/her agent).
Post a Comment