“Hey, Matt,
what’s going on here?? You’re just
agreeing with the Academy as often as not!” Yeah, I’m surprised at that, too. The unexpected upshot has been that I’ve rediscovered some great winners I hadn’t seen since high school. But don’t worry, I suspect that this run of non-dissent is
pretty much over with this one.
The Year: 1935
What the Nominees Were: Alice Adams, Broadway Melody of 1936,
Captain Blood, David Copperfield, The Informer, The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, A
Midsummer Night’s Dream, Les Miserables, Mutiny on the Bounty, Naughty
Marietta, Ruggles of Red Gap, Top Hat
Other Movies That Should Have Been
Considered: A Night at the Opera!
What Should’ve Won and Did Win: Mutiny on the Bounty
How Hard Was the Decision: Somewhat. I
re-watched The Informer, which is
wonderfully atmospheric and subversively dark, in every meaning of the word,
but it’s also hopelessly overwrought and Victor McLaglen, so appealing in
supporting parts, proves to be too one-note for this complex role.
Director: Frank Lloyd
Writers: Talbot Jennings, Jules
Furthman, and Carey Wilson, based on the book by Charles Nordhoff and James
Norman Hall
Stars: Clark Gable, Charles Laughton, Franchot
Tone
The Story: In 1789, unfortunate sailors
are forced against their will to join a two-year expedition to Tahiti to
bring back fruit trees, which might prove to be a cheaper way to feed the
slaves in Jamaica. The captain is
a petty little dictator, flogging the men mercilessly, stealing their food for
himself, and hounding more than one to death. His right hand man defends him… until he can take no
more.
Any Other Nominations or Wins: Gable, Laughton and Tone all competed against each other for Best Actor, meaning that McLaglen got it by default. (There still was no Best Supporting Oscar. They added that category the next year in response to this problem).
Any Other Nominations or Wins: Gable, Laughton and Tone all competed against each other for Best Actor, meaning that McLaglen got it by default. (There still was no Best Supporting Oscar. They added that category the next year in response to this problem).
How It Won: As with Grand Hotel, this was a no-brainer: the
biggest studio, biggest budget, biggest stars and biggest grosses all lined
up. The reviewers were split
between this and The Informer, (and
for the first time, they started giving out their own awards) but at the
Academy, it just couldn’t compete.
I’m siding with the Academy on this one.
Why It Won:
- This is our first big-budget epic and the verisimilitude and epic scale are simply stunning. Even better, Lloyd, usually a workman-like director, rose to the occasion, crafting exhilarating, almost Soviet-style montages out of hoisting sales and weighing anchor.
- No matter how bad things get, Fletcher Christian stands behind his venal captain—until he finds himself in love with an island girl, and has to leave her behind. It’s a good lesson in motivation: a weak man only needs something to rebel against, but in order to motivate a strong-minded hero, you must give also give him something to rebel for.
- The emotional impact of this movie is momentous: we seethe with indignation at Bligh’s abuses, melt with longing at the simple justice of island life, roar in sympathy with the revolt, then something funny happens… Bligh’s heroic survival tale complicates everything. Similar to Michael Scott on “The Office”, the tragedy of Bligh’s life is that he’s a spectacular sailor who was disastrously promoted to become a terrible leader of men, resorting to tyranny to avoid facing his own insecurities.
- This is not a good vs. good movie, it’s an evil vs. evil: choosing between tyranny and revolution is the most bitter choice anyone can make, because there are no good outcomes either way, and the worst fate awaits those who try to find a middle path.
- The ending of this movie is astoundingly brave: We await the final battle, which will settle for us how to feel about everything. Instead, each man evades the others’ final wrath, forcing each to make a separate peace, diminished in circumstances by their choices but denied a final cathartic confrontation that would tell them whether or not they made the right choice.
- Hollywood was far too skittish to make a true slave-revolt movie, but this is a clever way to tackle the same basic material. Not only are the men themselves explicitly enslaved onto the ship, they overthrow a mission to make slavery cheaper for the empire. What we don’t see in the movie is that Bligh took on another two-year trip and finally delivered the breadfruits to Jamaica, but it was all for nothing: the slaves refused to eat them.
How Available Is It?: Once again, it
has a nice looking DVD with few features..
3 comments:
I have to admit I've never seen Mutiny, but Ruggles of Red Gap is one of my 30s favorites - and also starring Laughton.
As for agreeing with the Academy, part of that has to be your (completely laudable) insistence on looking at what *could've* won. But also, the Academy definitely got a higher percentage right in the 30s than they ever did again.
I second Mark's love for RUGGLES, kind of a comic counterpart to MUTINY's liberation tale, which is coming soon in a nice restored Blu-ray from MoC in the UK if you are region-free. Otherwise you're stuck with an acceptable Universal MOD disc via Amazon.
I just missed the chance to see Ruggles at Film Forum here in NYC and I heard it was great. I suppose that now is the time to admit that, alas, I haven't seen every nominee every year, especially in this period of 12 nominees per year (many of which are naturally no longer available)
Post a Comment