The scene where Clarice meets Lecter in Silence of the Lambs is a masterpiece of tense and compelling scenework. To understand how great it is, we must remind ourselves of just how weird it is.
Let’s imagine some of the more traditional ways this scene could have gone. An FBI rookie is searching for a serial killer on the loose, so she interviews an imprisoned serial killer to see if he has any tips. The scene needs to be tense and compelling, with a ticking clock, right? Here are the obvious ways to do that…
- The killer is angry, resentful and threatening.
- He refuses to participate, forcing her to push and push to get through to him.
- He doesn’t want her there and keeps demanding that the guards take her away, but she keeps pleading with the guards for more time with him.
- This killer is calm, witty and sophisticated.
- He’s happy to have someone to talk to, provided that she’s smart enough to verbally spar with him
- We get an entirely different type of ticking clock: She’s told in advance that he’ll talk as long as possible …until he gets bored. This might seem to be less of a problem than open belligerence, but it turns out to be far more threatening, because she has no choice but to play his games and submit to his interrogations in order to maintain his interest long enough to get some tips.
In the DVD extras, Hopkins arrogantly says that no American actor could have played Lecter, because Americans are trained to make their characters organic and understandable, whereas British actors are willing to create characters externally, concerned more with the audience’s psychology than their own. His Lecter is essentially an inhuman devil: we’re not getting inside his head, he’s getting in ours.
To write this sort of scene, you can start with the question, “How would I feel if I’d been locked up for so long?”, which is fine, but it can also work to simply approach the scene externally, asking, “What sort of human monster have we never seen before? How can I create a scene that’s scary in an entirely different way from what the audience would suspect?”
Crucially, Lecter remains three-dimensional and believable, because (novelist) Harris, (screenwriter) Tally, and (actor) Hopkins have given him a clear (albeit demonic) internal logic, but he’s not a character that you would arrive at by putting yourself in this situation, or even by reading the literature on typical serial killers. This story doesn’t “write itself”, because Lecter is an entirely original creation.
2 comments:
Well said. Are you watching BETTER CALL SAUL yet? I think this kind of writing -- asking yourself what the "good" version of the dramatics in the scene would be, then skipping over obvious beats and worn-out scenarios to come to something that's fresh and totally unexpected while at the same time honoring the dynamics of that initial discarded idea -- is something that Vince Gilligan really excels at.
Always strikes me as the biggest difference between a script that will never get made and a movie - are there handfuls of scenes that are not trite? It's gonna be a movie! Note that the inverse doesn't hold true.
Post a Comment