So there’s
just not going to be a piece about which movie should have won Best Picture in
1929 today. After committing to
this quixotic project, it’s begun to sink in just how much work it’s going
to be, especially if I’m going to go in order. I’ve done some waffling about 1929’s pick, so it’ll have to appear next
week.
Additionally,
I’ve only belatedly come to accept that I’ll have to do some actual research
for this, and as books have come in, I’ve already got revisions to make on the
one piece I’ve done. To wit: in
the slot for “Why It Didn’t Win” last week, I just b.s.’d an answer, but Mason
Wiley and Damien Bona’s wonderful book “Inside Oscar” gave me the truth, which is much juicier. Here’s what I
should have said:
Why It Didn’t Win: For the first two
years of the Oscars, the award were determined by a committee run by the
biggest studios. You might
reasonably fear that this would cause each studio to game the system in favor of their
own movies, but in this case the opposite happened. Though MGM made The
Crowd, studio boss Louis B. Mayer despised it from conception through
distribution. When the committee
voted to give the movie its “Best Unique or Artistic Picture” Oscar, Mayer
harangued them all until 5 a.m., demanding that they choose another studio’s
movie instead. Sunrise, after all, represented the
small-town values that Mayer revered, while The
Crowd failed to promote “constructive ideas”. Finally, in order to get some sleep, the committee
relented.
Anyone who’s read Lilian Ross’s brilliant book “Picture” will recognize this portrait of Mayer’s rage, even towards his own studio’s product, if it failed to accord with his pollyanna-ish version of how America should be.
Anyone who’s read Lilian Ross’s brilliant book “Picture” will recognize this portrait of Mayer’s rage, even towards his own studio’s product, if it failed to accord with his pollyanna-ish version of how America should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment